Cacti Device Status Unknown Windows Nt

I am running vista ultimate & i keep getting this trying to download drivers for an unknown device so heres all the prop on itr any one knows what this thing is. Hi, From the message, I find that you have not installed the motherboard driver. Please install the driver with the driver disc came with the motherboard. If no Windows Vista compatible driver on the driver CD, please access the website of the computer manufacturer, and download the latest motherboard driver for Windows Vista. If no Windows Vista compatible driver available, please contact the computer manufacturer, and confirm whether your computer is compatible with Windows Vista.

Feb 09, 2013 Hi, i got same issue on the status of the device being 'unknown.' Because I couldn't find anything related to the Windows Cacti Server. Few days. Timbaland Shock Value 2 Zippy. a message ' USB device not recognised. Device status: Windows has stopped this device.

Hope it helps.

One of my professional duties in my past ten years was systems. Even my diploma thesis was dedicated to distributed monitoring (altough my professor sucked badly ). Apart from a few custom-programmed scripts to analyze special situations (e.g. Proxy clusters) I used tools that fellow administrators will find familiar: and. And another less famous text-configuration-based monitoring tool called. That worked well somehow but Cricket was hard to learn for my coworkers and Cacti seems unreliable and fundamentally broken in terms of SNMP checking.

Besides why do I have to set up availability checking in Nagios and set up checking of the same parameters in another software to draw graphs? Then in 2009 I came across an open-source software I hadn’t heard of before:. And although it has a few rough edges it seems way more professional than other common tools (the commercial tools I saw were even worse than the open-source variants). I tried it and after a lot of reading and trying it looks like it has a good potential to replace Nagios and Cacti.

So I thought I’d sum up my personal experiences with all of these tools. Their makers claim that it’s the “ industry-standard in IT infrastructure monitoring“.

Honestly it’s a great tool but considering how many years it has been existing it barely evolved. During my diploma thesis in the year 2000 I wrote an alternative software that I called “ MrNetwork” that dealt with flaws that Nagios hasn’t even fixed today. Still Nagios is a tool I have used for many years and it is very reliable.

Advantages: • open source • large community • many powerful plugins (and own plugins are easy to create: just write a program that prints a one-line string and set a certain return code) • easy-to-use web frontend • debugging plugins is moderately simple. • many thought-out features like host groups or notification options that make your life easier • dependencies (so that you don’t get 100 alerts if a router between the Nagios server and other servers went down) • nagvis plugin with a great interactive editor that draws nice management-suitable graphs (although I found the ndo2db interface hard to set up at first and a little flaky) Annoyances: • The focus is on availability checking – you don’t get fancy graphs on the values that are monitored (e.g how the CPU load was over time).