Ti Nspire Os 1.7

Sounds reasonable. On Jun 6, 5:52 am, Nelson Sousa wrote: >maybe less if people from outside Texas were also participating. >>Nelson >>>>On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 13:48, hastern wrote: >>>Since population of Texas is about 25 million, that means that fewer >>than 4% of the state was involved. >>>Nelson Sousa wrote: >>>I don't know Joe.

I'd say at least 1 person and less than 1 million. >>>>Nelson- Hide quoted text - >>- Show quoted text - TJ 06.06.09 15:49. That's exactly how I feel!!!!!

I want more power!!!!!!!!! (Sorry, I'm become a bit crazy.) I want add new functions to the built-in operating system! This way I wont need the useless document open or having to type in what document it came from in the MyLib folder! I want to have access of overclocking its processor! I want total control over the programing capabilities without limits! They think that we will make 'games', so they resist!

OS upgrade files. The latest versions of the TI-Nspire and TI-Nspire CAS Operating System are. The different upgrades released by TI, up to version 1.7. Downgrading Blocked by Latest Nspire OS Posted by Travis on 15 July 2010, 07:10 GMT. TI has released Nspire OS version 2.1. Although the release notes page lists only.

But they don't understand that we're so useless without it! Nothing 'good' can be made, without the sacrifice of performance! I want to strip down the operating system, so it's built for speed. Even though the nspire is fast compared to its predecessors, It's operating system slows it down significantly! Crack No Cd Do Worms 4. I mean, just observe and wait while the thing boots up. What on earth is it doing while booting up??

What on earth does it have to do while it boots up?!? Encryption is pathetic. There shouldn't be any security for this. It's like the makers are limiting the users by means of functionality! That's not cool! Need For Speed Rivals Tpb Torrent here. And why do the makers of this operating system take soo long? I don't really understand that part.

Even an individual can incorporate those simple features and release a newer version in quarter the time it takes Texas Instruments. Other than the fear of distraction, what makes TI refuse to unleash nspire's power? Why can't they make the whole thing an open source project? Wayne 07.06.09 16:04. 1) Adding functions into the OS yourself will be impossible. In order to do that, you would have to decompile the OS, make the changes (in assembly language), then recompile it and upload it into the calc. This could also allow some dangerous modifications to be made which could kill your calculator.

2) The 'Boot Up' thing is a battery saver. The Nspire contains three different types of memory. One is NOR Flash ROM where the OS is stored. The second type is NAND Flash ROM, where the file system is saved (Ctrl-S, etc). The third type is SDRAM, used as the 'workspace.' The advantage and point of the ROM memory is that it doesn't require a battery to maintain its data, and SDRAM does.

If the battery dies, the SDRAM loses all its info (the problem with the 83/84s). During the Boot Up of the Nspire, the OS is copied from the NOR memory to the SDRAM where it can be easily used. The Nspire keeps it on there for a specified time (now customizable as of 1.7), then allows it to be lost in order to reduce battery consumption. The point of all this is that during boot up, it's actually loading the OS into memory so it can be used, and it's done this way to save the battery. A great idea in my opinion. If you don't like this boot up time, set to 2 days by default, you can now change it to be longer (I think up to 5 days?), but be aware that this WILL reduce battery life in your calc. 3) Encryption and lack of open source has to do with copyright, patents, being ahead of the competition, and prevention of malware or viruses.